Current status of research on monocrystalline silicon solar energy

How efficient are monocrystalline solar cells?

Monocrystalline solar cells have reached efficiencies of 20% in the laboratory in 1985 and 26.2% under 100× concentration in 1988. During this period, the efficiency of industrial solar cells grew from 12% to 14.5%.

What is the current status of crystalline silicon in solar technology?

Except for niche applications, the status of crystalline silicon shows that a solar technology needs to go over 22% module efficiency at a cost below US$0.2 W −1 within the next 5 years to be competitive on the mass market.

What are crystalline silicon solar cells?

Crystalline silicon solar cells are today’s main photovoltaic technology, enabling the production of electricity with minimal carbon emissions and at an unprecedented low cost. This Review discusses their recent evolution, the present status of research and industrial development, and the near-future perspectives.

Are crystalline silicon solar cells a revolution?

Over the past decade, a revolution has occurred in the manufacturing of crystalline silicon solar cells. The conventional “Al-BSF” technology, which was the mainstream technology for many years, was replaced by the “PERC” technology.

What was the efficiency of the first silicon solar cell?

Using photolithography to define the coverage fraction and controlling the doping profile in the adjacent regions in the wafer, this concept resulted in the first silicon solar cell with a 25% designated area efficiency in 1999 (ref. 55).

What is the efficiency of silicon solar cells?

19.8% efficient “honeycomb” textured multicrystalline and 24.4% monocrystalline silicon solar cells High efficiency PERL and PERT silicon solar cells on FZ and MCZ Substrates 16.7% efficiency, laser textured, buried contact polycrystalline silicon solar cells Zweibel, K., 2005.

Monocrystalline Silicon Solar Cells Applied In Photovoltaic System. ... Status and Future Prospects. Solar Energy 85, 1580 – 1608. Retrieved . November 3, 201 9 from https://doi.or g/10.1016/j ...